4.6 Article

Altered autophagy induction by sera from pregnant women with pre-eclampsia: a case-control study

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12755

Keywords

Autophagy; endoglin; p62; pre-eclampsia; pregnancy; transforming growth factor 1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Mechanisms leading to pre-eclampsia remain incompletely defined. Autophagy is a conserved process necessary for cell survival under adverse conditions. We hypothesised that sera from women with healthy pregnancies and women with pre-eclampsia differed in autophagy induction. Design A case-control study. Setting Weill Cornell Medical College. Population Twenty-four normotensive pregnant women and 20 women with pre-eclampsia. Methods Sera were incubated with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from female donors. After 48hours the PBMCs were lysed and the intracellular concentration of p62 was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Its concentration is inversely proportional to the extent of autophagy induction. Serum endoglin, interleukin 13 (IL-13), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and transforming growth factor 1 (TGF-1) levels were quantitated by ELISA. Main outcome measures Differences in autophagy induction and serum mediator levels in the two groups. Results Autophagy induction increased with gestational age in sera from normotensive women (P=0.0045), but not in women with pre-eclampsia. In the presence of an autophagy inducer, the capacity for autophagy induction decreased with gestational age in sera from women with pre-eclampsia (P=0.0235), but not from controls. Endoglin concentrations were positively associated with the extent of autophagy induction in controls only (P=0.0141). There was no association between autophagy and serum IL-13, IGF-1, or TGF-1 levels. Conclusions Sera from women with pre-eclampsia differ from normotensive women by their inability to induce autophagy as a function of gestational age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available