4.6 Article

Uterine rupture in the Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x

Keywords

Incidence; population based; unscarred uterus; uterine rupture; VBAC

Funding

  1. Dutch Organisation for Health Research [3610.0024]
  2. Matty Brand Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess incidence of uterine rupture in scarred and unscarred uteri and its maternal and fetal complications in a nationwide design. Population-based cohort study. All 98 maternity units in the Netherlands. All women delivering in the Netherlands between August 2004 and August 2006 (n = 371 021). Women with uterine rupture were prospectively collected using a web-based notification system. Data from all pregnant women in the Netherlands during the study period were obtained from Dutch population-based registers. Results were stratified by uterine scar. Population-based incidences, severe maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality, relative and absolute risk estimates. There were 210 cases of uterine rupture (5.9 per 10 000 pregnancies). Of these women, 183 (87.1%) had a uterine scar, incidences being 5.1 and 0.8 per 10 000 in women with and without uterine scar. No maternal deaths and 18 cases of perinatal death (8.7%) occurred. The overall absolute risk of uterine rupture was 1 in 1709. In univariate analysis, women with a prior caesarean, epidural anaesthesia, induction of labour (irrespective of agents used), pre- or post-term pregnancy, overweight, non-Western ethnic background and advanced age had an elevated risk of uterine rupture. The overall relative risk of induction of labour was 3.6 (95% confidence interval 2.7-4.8). The population-based incidence of uterine rupture in the Netherlands is comparable with other Western countries. Although much attention is paid to scar rupture associated with uterotonic agents, 13% of ruptures occurred in unscarred uteri and 72% occurred during spontaneous labour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available