4.6 Article

Changes in the ST-interval segment of the fetal electrocardiogram in relation to acid-base status at birth

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01949.x

Keywords

Acidaemia; cardiotocography; ECG; fetal monitoring; ST analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess the occurrence of ST-interval segment changes of the fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) and cardiotocographic (CTG) abnormalities preceding acidaemia at birth. Case-control study. University hospital labour ward. Newborns with severe cord artery metabolic acidaemia (pH < 7.00 and lactate >= 10 mmol/l; n = 24), moderate metabolic acidaemia (pH 7.00-7.09 and lactate >= 10; n = 48), acidaemia (pH 7.00-7.09; n = 52), pre-acidaemia (pH 7.10-7.19; n = 265), and controls (pH >= 7.20; n = 117). Monitoring traces were assessed blinded to outcome. CTG and ST changes. Any ST event occurred significantly more often among cases with severe (79%) and moderate (75%) metabolic acidaemia than among controls (50%). The difference was restricted to baseline T/QRS rises and to the second stage of labour, during which any event only occurred significantly more often among cases with severe metabolic acidaemia (62%) than among controls (38%). ST events coincided with abnormal CTG patterns in 67, 44, 40, and 28% of cases with severe and moderate metabolic acidaemia, acidaemia, and pre-acidaemia, respectively, and in 12% of controls. ST events with intermediary CTG were similarly frequent in the case groups (0-6%) as in the controls (4%). The ST guidelines stated intervention in 96, 62, 73, and 49% of case groups and 23% of controls. Only two of three cases with severe and less than half of cases with moderate metabolic acidaemia were preceded by ST events coinciding with CTG abnormalities. It is therefore important to intervene for long-lasting, rapidly deteriorating or marked (preterminal) CTG abnormalities, also in the absence of ST events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available