4.5 Article

Development of a high-throughput screening-compatible assay to identify inhibitors of the CK2α/CK2β interaction

Journal

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 468, Issue -, Pages 4-14

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.09.003

Keywords

Protein kinase CK2; Protein-protein interactions; Fluorescence anisotropy; Isothermal titration calorimetry; Molecular docking

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft - Germany [NI 643/4-1]
  2. EU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increased activity of protein kinase CK2 is associated with various types of cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and chronic inflammation. In the search for CK2 inhibitors, attention has expanded toward compounds disturbing the interaction between CK2 alpha and CK2 beta in addition to established active site-directed approaches. The current article describes the development of a fluorescence anisotropy-based assay that mimics the principle of CK2 subunit interaction by using CK2 alpha(1-335) and the fluorescent probe CF-Ahx-Pc as a CK2 beta analog. In addition, we identified new inhibitors able to displace the fluorescent probe from the subunit interface on CK2 alpha(1-335). Both CF-Ahx-Pc and the inhibitors I-Pc and Cl-Pc were derived from the cyclic peptide Pc, a mimetic of the C-terminal CK2 alpha-binding motif of CK2 beta. The design of the two inhibitors was based on docking studies using the known crystal structure of the Pc/CK2 alpha(1-335) complex. The dissociation constants obtained in the fluorescence anisotropy assay for binding of all compounds to human CK2 alpha(1-335) were validated by isothermal titration calorimetry. I-Pc was identified as the tightest binding ligand with a K-D value of 240 nM and was shown to inhibit the CK2 holoenzyme-dependent phosphorylation of PDX-1, a substrate requiring the presence of CK2 beta, with an IC50 value of 92 mu M. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available