4.5 Article

A critical evaluation of ecological indices for the comparative analysis of microbial communities based on molecular datasets

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiw209

Keywords

diversity concept; effective numbers; evenness; T-RFLP; next-generation sequencing; anaerobic digestion

Categories

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Interdisciplinary GRADuate School for Environmental Research (HIGRADE)
  2. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In times of global change and intensified resource exploitation, advanced knowledge of ecophysiological processes in natural and engineered systems driven by complex microbial communities is crucial for both safeguarding environmental processes and optimising rational control of biotechnological processes. To gain such knowledge, high-throughput molecular techniques are routinely employed to investigate microbial community composition and dynamics within a wide range of natural or engineered environments. However, for molecular dataset analyses no consensus about a generally applicable alpha diversity concept and no appropriate benchmarking of corresponding statistical indices exist yet. To overcome this, we listed criteria for the appropriateness of an index for such analyses and systematically scrutinised commonly employed ecological indices describing diversity, evenness and richness based on artificial and real molecular datasets. We identified appropriate indices warranting interstudy comparability and intuitive interpretability. The unified diversity concept based on 'effective numbers of types' provides the mathematical framework for describing community composition. Additionally, the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity as a beta-diversity index was found to reflect compositional changes. The employed statistical procedure is presented comprising commented R-scripts and example datasets for user-friendly trial application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available