4.5 Article

The tradeoff between fit perceptions across recruitment stages by new job seekers

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-05-2016-0295

Keywords

Recruitment; Person-job fit; Person-organization fit; Job choice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to explore the tradeoff between person-job (PJ) fit and person-organization (PO) fit by new job seekers across different recruitment stages and the influence on their job choice decisions. Design/methodology/approach - A time-lapse research design was adopted with data from a survey over a two-year period of college students majoring in hospitality and tourism management at different recruitment stages (i.e. generating applications, maintaining applicant status and making a job choice). Findings - The results suggest that PJ fit has a stronger influence on job choice decisions than PO fit, and both fit perceptions are consistent across recruitment stages. However, the difference between the two fit perceptions may be affected by direct interactions with recruiters at career fairs and interviews. Practical implications - When recruiters start interacting with job seekers during the initial stage of the recruitment process, the recruiters are more likely to receive a favorable job choice decision from these potential applicants. Additionally, recruiters should create a positive perception of hiring companies and jobs through career fairs or other face-to-face communications to keep job seekers interested and maintain their applicant status throughout the recruitment stages. Originality/value - This paper explores important factors that influence job seekers' job choice decisions throughout the recruitment process with three main stages, which provides a more holistic overview of the transition of job seekers' fit perceptions of the job and the organization. It also provides empirical support for current understanding of recruitment issues in the hospitality industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available