4.5 Article

A GA-LR wrapper approach for feature selection in network intrusion detection

Journal

COMPUTERS & SECURITY
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 255-277

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2017.06.005

Keywords

Intrusion detection systems; Anomaly detection; Feature selection; Wrapper approach; Genetic algorithm; Logistic regression; Classification; Decision tree; KDD99; UNSW-NB15

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intrusions constitute one of the main issues in computer network security. Through malicious actions, hackers can have unauthorised access that compromises the integrity, the confidentiality, and the availability of resources or services. Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) have been developed to monitor and filter network activities by identifying attacks and alerting network administrators. Different IDS approaches have emerged using data mining, machine learning, statistical analysis, and artificial intelligence techniques such as genetic algorithms, artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, swarm intelligence, etc. Due to the high dimensionality of the exchanged data, applying those techniques will be extremely time consuming. Feature selection is needed to select the optimal subset of features that represents the entire dataset to increase the accuracy and the classification performance of the IDS. In this work, we apply a wrapper approach based on a genetic algorithm as a search strategy and logistic regression as a learning algorithm for network intrusion detection systems to select the best subset of features. The experiment will be conducted on the KDD99 dataset and the UNSW-NB15 dataset. Three different decision tree classifiers are used to measure the performance of the selected subsets of features. The obtained results are compared with other feature selection approaches to verify the efficiency of our proposed approach. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available