3.8 Article

Newer anticonvulsants: Lamotrigine, topiramate and gabapentin

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23028

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND The second generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), which include lamotrigine, topiramate, and gabapentin, have been introduced during the past 20 years. Because the newer AEDs differ in their pharmacokinetics from the first generation AEDs, it is hoped that the second generation AEDs will be less teratogenic. METHODS The findings in pregnancy cohorts and case-control studies concerning lamotrigine, topiramate and gabapentin-exposed pregnancies have been analyzed. RESULTS The rate of all malformations in lamotrigine monotherapy-exposed pregnancies has been between 2.0 and 5.6%, in comparison to baseline rates of 1.1 to 3.6% in two unexposed comparison groups. Compared to reference populations, a higher risk (0.4%) of isolated oral clefts has been observed in one cohort of 1562 lamotrigine-exposed pregnancies, but the risk was lower (0.1%) in other studies. In topiramate-exposed pregnancies, the rate of all malformations has been 4.2 to 4.9%, with an increase in oral clefts with and without other anomalies. The limited information available now for gabapentin has shown no evidence of teratogenicity. Concerning other developmental effects of these drugs, young children exposed to lamotrigine in utero have shown no deficits in cognitive function. Prenatal exposure to topiramate has been associated with an elevated frequency of small size for gestational age newborns. CONCLUSIONS The information available suggests an increased risk of oral clefts in infants exposed to topiramate, and perhaps lamotrigine, early in pregnancy, and of growth retardation for topiramate-exposed infants. Larger sample sizes are needed to clarify the questions that have been raised. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 94:599606, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available