4.3 Article

Burrow Dusting or Oral Vaccination Prevents Plague-Associated Prairie Dog Colony Collapse

Journal

ECOHEALTH
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 451-462

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10393-017-1236-y

Keywords

Black-tailed prairie dog; Cynomys ludovicianus; Deltamethrin; Plague; Raccoonpox; Vaccine

Funding

  1. CPW
  2. Colorado's Species Conservation Trust Fund
  3. USGS
  4. US Fish and Wildlife Service
  5. Western association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plague impacts prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.), the endangered black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes) and other sensitive wildlife species. We compared efficacy of prophylactic treatments (burrow dusting with deltamethrin or oral vaccination with recombinant sylvatic plague vaccine [RCN-F1/V307]) to placebo treatment in black-tailed prairie dog (C. ludovicianus) colonies. Between 2013 and 2015, we measured prairie dog apparent survival, burrow activity and flea abundance on triplicate plots (blocks) receiving dust, vaccine or placebo treatment. Epizootic plague affected all three blocks but emerged asynchronously. Dust plots had fewer fleas per burrow (P < 0.0001), and prairie dogs captured on dust plots had fewer fleas (P < 0.0001) than those on vaccine or placebo plots. Burrow activity and prairie dog density declined sharply in placebo plots when epizootic plague emerged. Patterns in corresponding dust and vaccine plots were less consistent and appeared strongly influenced by timing of treatment applications relative to plague emergence. Deltamethrin or oral vaccination enhanced apparent survival within two blocks. Applying insecticide or vaccine prior to epizootic emergence blunted effects of plague on prairie dog survival and abundance, thereby preventing colony collapse. Successful plague mitigation will likely entail strategic combined uses of burrow dusting and oral vaccination within large colonies or colony complexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available