4.1 Article

The breeding status of Peregrine Falcons Falco peregrinus in the UK and Isle of Man in 2002

Journal

BIRD STUDY
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 421-436

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2010.511148

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Esmee Fairburn Foundation
  2. Northern Ireland Environment Agency
  3. Scottish Ornithologists' Club
  4. RSPB
  5. Scottish Natural Heritage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Capsule Numbers of breeding Peregrines are now higher than ever recorded and the recovery of the species within the UK has continued since 1991. Aims To estimate the current Peregrine breeding population and its changes over time by recording breeding evidence and nesting range occupancy at known and potential Peregrine eyries. Methods Attempts were made to check all potentially suitable Peregrine nesting locations for signs of Peregrine occupation. Causes of nest failure were documented where possible. Estimates of occupancy of nesting ranges that could not be visited were based on the proportion of ranges occupied from visited nesting ranges in the same region. Results In 2002, 1530 Peregrine nesting ranges were estimated to be occupied, comprising 1456 pairs or single birds confirmed as in occupation, and 74 estimated extras (5% of total occupied nesting ranges) that were not visited. Including non-breeding singletons holding nesting ranges, the UK and Isle of Man figure of 'Ratcliffe pairs' was 1437. This showed a 12% increase from 1991 and a 64% increase from the 1930s. However, there were geographical differences in change, with rapid expansion in the south of England tempered by declines in northern Scotland. Conclusions The primary reasons for the population increase is primarily because of range expansion driven by a plentiful food supply and perhaps an increased tolerance of human disturbance. In areas where the species has declined, various factors (separately or in combination) including reduced food supply and persecution are likely to be involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available