4.4 Article

Pilot investigation of isradipine in the treatment of bipolar depression motivated by genome-wide association

Journal

BIPOLAR DISORDERS
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 199-203

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12143

Keywords

proof-of-concept; calcium channel antagonist; depression; dihydropyridine; L-type calcium channel; genome-wide; isradipine; bipolar disorder

Funding

  1. Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research at the Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Motivated by genetic association data implicating L-type calcium channels in bipolar disorder liability, we sought to estimate the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of isradipine in the adjunctive treatment of bipolar depression. Methods A total of 12 patients with bipolar I or II depression entered this pilot, proof-of-concept eight-week investigation and 10 returned for at least one post-baseline visit. They were initiated on isradipine at 2.5mg and titrated up to 10mg daily, with blinded assessments of depression using the Montgomery-angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as well as adverse effects. Results Among the 10 patients, three had bipolar II disorder; all but two reported current episode duration longer than six months. In all, four of 10 completed the study; no significant adverse events were observed, although one subject discontinued treatment per protocol because of possible hypomanic symptoms which had resolved prior to study visit. In a mixed-effects model, mean improvement in depression severity, assessed by MADRS, was 2.1 (standard error=0.36) points/week (p<0.001). Two of the 10 subjects remitted and four of the 10 subjects experienced 50% or greater symptomatic improvement with treatment. Conclusions Isradipine merits further investigation for the treatment of bipolar depression. This preliminary trial illustrates the potential utility of genetic investigation in identifying psychiatric treatment targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available