4.2 Article

Deforestation Trends of Tropical Dry Forests in Central Brazil

Journal

BIOTROPICA
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 395-400

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/btp.12010

Keywords

cerrado; deforestation patterns; forest fragmentation; Parana River Basin; tropical dry forest

Categories

Funding

  1. USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center
  2. Fundacao O Boticario de Protecao a Natureza
  3. Cleveland Metroparks Zoo (Scott Neotropical Fund)
  4. Parrots International
  5. Canadian Parrot Symposium
  6. Pesquisa e Conservacao do Cerrado (PEQUI)
  7. Pacific Islands Conservation Research Association
  8. CAPES/Fulbright [15053166/201604-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tropical dry forests are the most threatened forest type in the world yet a paucity of research about them stymies development of appropriate conservation actions. The ParanA River Basin has the most significant dry forest formations in the Cerrado biome of central Brazil and is threatened by intense land conversion to pastures and agriculture. We examined changes in ParanA River Basin deforestation rates and fragmentation across three time intervals that covered 31yr using Landsat imagery. Our results indicated a 66.3 percent decrease in forest extent between 1977 and 2008, with an annual rate of forest cover change of 3.5 percent. Landscape metrics further indicated severe forest loss and fragmentation, resulting in an increase in the number of fragments and reduction in patch sizes. Forest fragments in flatlands have virtually disappeared and the only significant forest remnants are mostly found over limestone outcrops in the eastern part of the basin. If current patterns persist, we project that these forests will likely disappear within 25yr. These patterns may be reversed with creation of protected areas and involvement of local people to preserve small fragments that can be managed for restoration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available