4.2 Article

Frugivory and Seed Dispersal by the Lowland Tapir Tapirus terrestris in the Peruvian Amazon

Journal

BIOTROPICA
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages 215-222

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00549.x

Keywords

diet; dung; fecal analysis; fruit consumption; Madre de Dios; Perrisodactyla; seed size

Categories

Funding

  1. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  2. US National Science Foundation Biotic Surveys and Inventory [NSF-DEB-0717453]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lowland tapir Tapirus terrestris is the largest herbivore in the Neotropics and feeds on a large quantity of fruits, often ingesting the seeds and defecating them intact. Seed dispersal by the lowland tapir in the southwestern Amazon was studied by examining seeds from 135 dung samples collected between 2005 and 2007. Seeds of a total of 122 plant species were identified, representing 68 genera and 33 families. The species accumulation curve showed that more species can be expected with further sampling. Many species (45%) were only encountered once, and only 10 percent of all species were found in 410 samples, indicating that the lowland tapir is an opportunistic forager. Seed diversity showed a clear seasonal pattern and was highly correlated with fruit availability. Seed diameter ranged from <1 to 25 mm with 81 percent <10 mm diam. The size distribution of seeds found in lowland tapir dung generally followed that of seeds found in the forest, but had a lower proportion of seeds in the smallest size class (<2.5 mm) and a larger proportion found in the largest size class (20-25 mm). The diversity of seeds encountered in dung of the lowland tapir in this study was much higher than in previous studies. We conclude that the lowland tapir is a potential disperser for a large number of plant species, including many that previously have been thought to be dispersed only by large primates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available