4.5 Article

Quantitative profiling of polar primary metabolites of two chickpea cultivars with contrasting responses to salinity

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.07.002

Keywords

Quantitative profiling; Primary metabolites; GC-QqQ-MS; LC-QqQ-MS; Chickpea; Salinity

Funding

  1. Bioplatforms Australia Pty. Ltd.
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  3. Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC)
  4. South Australian Government
  5. University of Adelaide
  6. University of Queensland
  7. University of Melbourne
  8. Australia-India Strategic Research Fund, Australian Government Department of Industry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a GC-QqQ-MS method for the quantification of forty-eight primary metabolites from four major classes (sugars, sugar acids, sugar phosphates, and organic acids) which can be applied to a number of biological systems. The method was validated in terms of linearity, reproducibility and recovery, using both calibration standards and real samples. Additionally, twenty-eight biogenic amines and amino acids were quantified using an established LC-QqQ-MS method. Both GC-QqQ-MS and LC-QqQ-MS quantitative methods were applied to plant extracts from flower and pod tissue of two chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars differing in their ability to tolerate salinity, which were grown under control and salt-treated conditions. Statistical analysis was applied to the data sets using the absolute concentrations of metabolites to investigate the differences in metabolite profiles between the different cultivars, plant tissues, and treatments. The method is a significant improvement of present methodology for quantitative GC-MS metabolite profiling of organic acids and sugars, and provides new insights of chickpea metabolic responses to salinity stress. It is applicable to the analysis of dynamic changes in endogenous concentrations of polar primary metabolites to study metabolic responses to environmental stresses in complex biological tissues. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available