4.5 Article

Extension of TOPSIS Method and its Application in Investment

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 693-705

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-017-2736-3

Keywords

TOPSIS; MCDM; Optimism coefficient; IFWA operator; Investment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61671384]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China [2016JM6018]
  3. Aviation Science Foundation [20165553036]
  4. Fund of Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology SAST [SAST2016083]
  5. Seed Foundation of Innovation and Creation for Graduate Students in Northwestern Polytechnical University [Z2017142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) is an effective technique to solve multi-criteria decision-making problem. It aims to select the alternative, which has the shortest distance from positive ideal solution (PIS) and the farthest distance from negative ideal solution (NIS). Nevertheless, much literature has demonstrated that the solution calculated by TOPSIS only is the compromise of PIS and NIS, and it is of great restriction in dealing with the practical problems which have diverse demands and properties. Therefore, in the presented model, an optimism coefficient is defined to expand the physical meaning of the standard TOPSIS. Decision-makers (DMs) can describe their attitudes toward risk and profit by changing the value of optimism coefficient. Furthermore, intuitionistic fuzzy number is introduced to measure the evaluations (linguistic values) of DMs to alternatives under diverse criteria. Intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator is used for fusing the judgments of all DMs. Finally, a conclusion can be safely obtained that the proposed model is stable and validity from the illustrative examples and sensitivity analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available