4.6 Article

APOGEE Data Releases 13 and 14: Stellar Parameter and Abundance Comparisons with Independent Analyses

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 156, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad4f5

Keywords

Galaxy: abundances; stars: abundances; surveys

Funding

  1. Birgit and Hellmuth Hertz Foundation (via the Royal Physiographic Society of Lund)
  2. Crafoord Foundation
  3. Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggmastare
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [AYA2017-86389-P, AYA-2017-88254-P]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  6. Simons Foundation Society
  7. Flatiron Institute Center for Computational Astrophysics in New York City
  8. Premium Postdoctoral Research Program of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  9. Hungarian NKFI Grants of the Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Office [K-119517]
  10. FONDECYT [3180210]
  11. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  12. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  13. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  14. Brazilian Participation Group
  15. Carnegie Institution for Science
  16. Carnegie Mellon University
  17. Chilean Participation Group
  18. French Participation Group
  19. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
  20. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  21. Johns Hopkins University
  22. Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (IPMU)/University of Tokyo
  23. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  24. Leibniz Institut fur Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP)
  25. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie (MPIA Heidelberg)
  26. Max-Planck-Institut fur Astrophysik (MPA Garching)
  27. Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik (MPE)
  28. National Astronomical Observatories of China
  29. New Mexico State University
  30. New York University
  31. University of Notre Dame
  32. Observatorio Nacional/MCTI
  33. Ohio State University
  34. Pennsylvania State University
  35. Shanghai Astronomical Observatory
  36. United Kingdom Participation Group
  37. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  38. University of Arizona
  39. University of Colorado Boulder
  40. University of Oxford
  41. University of Portsmouth
  42. University of Utah
  43. University of Virginia
  44. University of Washington
  45. University of Wisconsin
  46. Vanderbilt University
  47. Yale University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data from the SDSS-IV/Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE-2) have been released as part of SDSS Data Releases 13 (DR13) and 14 (DR14). These include high-resolution H-band spectra, radial velocities, and derived stellar parameters and abundances. DR13, released in 2016 August, contained APOGEE data for roughly 150,000 stars, and DR14, released in 2017 August, added about 110,000 more. Stellar parameters and abundances have been derived with an automated pipeline, the APOGEE Stellar Parameter and Chemical Abundance Pipeline (ASPCAP). We evaluate the performance of this pipeline by comparing the derived stellar parameters and abundances to those inferred from optical spectra and analysis for several hundred stars. For most elements-C, Na, Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Cr, Mn, Ni-the DR14 ASPCAP analyses have systematic differences with the comparisons samples of less than 0.05 dex (median), and random differences of less than 0.15 dex (standard deviation). These differences are a combination of the uncertainties in both the comparison samples as well as the ASPCAP analysis. Compared to the references, magnesium is the most accurate alpha-element derived by ASPCAP, and shows a very clear thin/thick disk separation, while nickel is the most accurate iron-peak element (besides iron itself).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available