4.3 Article

SEX-TYPING OF BLUE-CROWNED LAUGHINGTHRUSH (GARRLUAX COURTOISI) USING CHD1-BASED POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION

Journal

APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 6341-6347

Publisher

CORVINUS UNIV BUDAPEST
DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1605_63416347

Keywords

blue-crowned laughingthrush; sex identification; CHD1; endangered species

Funding

  1. Co-Innovation Center for In Vitro Diagnostic Reagents and Devices of Jiangxi Province [2013-CXTD002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31460591, 31401047, 31660302, 31760625]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20143ACB21006, 20142BCB23028]
  4. Science and technology research project of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department [14571]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Blue-crowned laughingthrush (Garrluax courtoisi), an endemic species in China, is a critically endangered and sexually monomorphic bird. It is difficult to identify the gender of this species through the observation of its external morphology. To solve this problem, we herein established a CHD/-based PCR method for sex-typing of Garrluax courtoisi. We first collected blood samples from six Blue-crowned laughingthrush raised in Nanchang Zoo, and then extracted high-quality genomic DNA from blood clots using an optimized phenol/chloroform method. We designed a degenerate primer pair to amplify fragments of the CHD1 gene, resulting an amplicon of 700 bp for males and an extra PCR product of 600 bp for females. We also performed extensive behavioral observations of these six birds and the obtained data allowed us to deduce the sexes of these birds. The sex-typing results are generally consistent with the behavior-deduced results. This study sheds light on the sex determination of other endangered birds, and also paves a road to further test the reproduction mechanism, taxonomic classification and population relationships of Garrluax courtoisi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available