4.6 Article

Cellulases adsorb reversibly on biomass lignin

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages 2869-2880

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.26820

Keywords

adsorption; biomass; cellulase; competition; lignin; reversible

Funding

  1. BioValue SPIR Innovation Fund Denmark [0603-00522B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adsorption of cellulases onto lignin is considered a major factor in retarding enzymatic cellulose degradation of lignocellulosic biomass. However, the adsorption mechanisms and kinetics are not well understood for individual types of cellulases. This study examines the binding affinity, kinetics of adsorption, and competition of four monocomponent cellulases of Trichoderma reesei during adsorption onto lignin. TrCel7A, TrCel6A, TrCel7B, and TrCel5A were radiolabeled for adsorption experiments on lignin-rich residues (LRRs) isolated from hydrothermally pretreated spruce (L-HPS) and wheat straw (L-HPWS), respectively. On the basis of adsorption isotherms fitted to the Langmuir model, the ranking of binding affinities was TrCel5A > TrCel6A > TrCel7B > TrCel7A on both types of LRRs. The enzymes had a higher affinity to the L-HPS than to the L-HPWS. Adsorption experiments with dilution after 1 and 24 hr and kinetic modeling were performed to quantify any irreversible binding over time. Models with reversible binding parameters fitted well and can explain the results obtained. The adsorption constants obtained from the reversible models agreed with the fitted Langmuir isotherms and suggested that reversible adsorption-desorption existed at equilibrium. Competitive binding experiments showed that individual types of cellulases competed for binding sites on the lignin and the adsorption data fitted the Langmuir adsorption model. Overall, the data strongly indicate that the adsorption of cellulases onto lignin is reversible and the findings have implications for the development of more efficient cellulose degrading enzymes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available