4.7 Article

Age-based differences in preferences and affective reactions towards a robot's personality during interaction

Journal

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 245-257

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.039

Keywords

Child-robot interaction; Modelling artificial personalities; Age-based differences; Social robots

Funding

  1. Mexican National Research Council (CONACyT)
  2. CONACyT Language Technologies Research Network [260178, 271622]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The design and use of social robots addressed to the children population is a growing research field. The understanding of how the children react, or what are their preferences towards a robot with different styles of interaction is an important aspect to maximise the construction of a social bond between the robot and the child. In this paper we describe an experiment to assess these affective reactions and preferences based on an age-based stratification. A Wizard-Of-Oz scenario was used to design a playing mission where the child guides the robot, via voice commands, through a maze while collecting sweets and avoiding obstacles. Every participant interacted with two robots during the session. Two types of personalities were modelled in the robots with the same physical appearance: the agreeableness, and its opposite, disagreeableness personality trait. A total of 174 children between 6 and 11 years old took part in the experiment. The data about the affective reactions and preferences of the children towards the robots were collected through a multiple choice questionnaire. Significative statistical differences based on the age were found in the self-reported information provided by the children. These differences were noticeable in the youngest children (aged 6-7) with respect to the rest of the participants. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available