4.6 Article

Microflotation performance for algal separation

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages 1663-1673

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24449

Keywords

algal biomass; microflotation; fluidics; bioflocculation; dissolved air flotation; dispersed air flotation

Funding

  1. Concept Fund of Yorkshire Forward
  2. EPSRC [EP/I019790/1]
  3. Royal Society
  4. University of Sheffield
  5. Royal Society of Yorkshire Forward
  6. EPSRC [EP/I019790/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I019790/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The performance of microflotation, dispersed air flotation with microbubble clouds with bubble size about 50 mu m, for algae separation using fluidic oscillation for microbubble generation is investigated. This fluidic oscillator converts continuous air supply into oscillatory flow with a regular frequency to generate bubbles of the scale of the exit pore. Bubble characterization results showed that average bubble size generated under oscillatory air flow state was 86 mu m, approximately twice the size of the diffuser pore size of 38 mu m. In contrast, continuous air flow at the same rate through the same diffusers yielded an average bubble size of 1,059 mu m, 28 times larger than the pore size. Following microbubble generation, the separation of algal cells under fluidic oscillator generated microbubbles was investigated by varying metallic coagulant types, concentration and pH. Best performances were recorded at the highest coagulant dose (150?mg/L) applied under acidic conditions (pH 5). Amongst the three metallic coagulants studied, ferric chloride yielded the overall best result of 99.2% under the optimum conditions followed closely by ferric sulfate (98.1%) and aluminum sulfate with 95.2%. This compares well with conventional dissolved air flotation (DAF) benchmarks, but has a highly turbulent flow, whereas microflotation is laminar with several orders of magnitude lower energy density. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:16631673. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available