4.6 Review

The use of high-solids loadings in biomass pretreatment-a review

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 1430-1442

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24464

Keywords

high solids; lignocellulose conversion; pretreatment; pilot-scale; high density

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture National Institute for Food and Agriculture Biomass Research and Development Initiative [1100000836, 2011-10006-30363]
  2. Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station [11-05-086]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of high-solids loadings (=15% solids, w/w) in the unit operations of lignocellulose conversion processes potentially offers many advantages over lower-solids loadings, including increased sugar and ethanol concentrations and decreased production and capital costs. Since the term lignocellulosic materials refers to a wide range of feedstocks (agricultural and forestry residues, distillery by-products, and dedicated energy crops like grasses), the term solids loading here is defined by the amount of dry material that enters the process divided by the total mass of material and water added to the material. The goal of this study is to provide a consolidated review of studies using a high-solids pretreatment step in the conversion process. Included in this review is a brief discussion of the limitations, such as the lack of available water to promote mass transfer, increased substrate viscosity, and increased concentration of inhibitors produced affecting pretreatment, as well as descriptions and findings of pretreatment studies performed at high solids, the latest reactor designs developed for pretreatment at bench- and pilot-scales to address some of the limitations, and high-solids pretreatment operations that have been scaled-up and incorporated into demonstration facilities. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:14301442. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available