4.6 Article

Differential in-gel electrophoresis (DIGE) analysis of CHO cells under hyperosmotic pressure: Osmoprotective effect of glycine betaine addition

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 1395-1403

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24442

Keywords

rCHO cells; glycine betaine; hyperosmolality; proteomics; DIGE

Funding

  1. MEST [R31-2008-000-10071-0]
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  3. WCU through the KOSEF
  4. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [R31-2008-000-10071-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of glycine betaine combined with hyperosmolality is known to be an efficient means for achieving high protein production in recombinant Chinese hamster ovary (rCHO) cells. In order to understand the intracellular events and identify the key factors in rCHO cells cultivated with glycine betaine under hyperosmotic conditions, two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) followed by mass spectrometric analysis was applied. Differentially expressed 19 protein spots were selected and 16 different kinds of proteins were successfully identified. The identified proteins were associated with cellular metabolism (PEPCK, GAPDH, and PK), cellular architecture (beta-tubulin and beta-actin), protein folding (GRP78 and OSP94), mRNA processing (Rbm34, ACF, and IPMK), and protein secretion (?-COP). 2D-Western blot analysis of beta-tubulin, GAPDH, Peroxidoxin-1, and GRP78 confirmed the proteomic findings. The proteins identified from this study, which are related to cell growth and antibody production, can be applied to cell engineering for maximizing the efficacy of the use of glycine betaine combined with hyperosmolality in rCHO cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:13951403. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available