4.5 Article

T cell receptor alpha variable 12-2 bias in the immunodominant response to Yellow fever virus

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages 258-272

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eji.201747082

Keywords

Antigen recognition; Germline; T cell receptor Alpha Variable(TRAV)-12-2; T cell receptor bias; Yellow Fever virus

Categories

Funding

  1. Ludwig Cancer Research (N.Y., U.S.A.)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030_152856, CRSII3_160708]
  3. SwissTransMed [KIP 18]
  4. Swiss Cancer League [3507-08-2014]
  5. Alfred and Annemarie von Sick (Switzerland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The repertoire of human T-cell receptors (TCRs) is generated via somatic recombination of germline gene segments. Despite this enormous variation, certain epitopes can be immunodominant, associated with high frequencies of antigen-specific Tcells and/or exhibit bias toward a TCR gene segment. Here, we studied the TCR repertoire of the HLA-A*0201-restricted epitope LLWNGPMAV (hereafter, A2/LLW) from Yellow Fever virus, which generates an immunodominant CD8(+) Tcell response to the highly effective YF-17D vaccine. We discover that these A2/LLW-specific CD8(+) Tcells are highly biased for the TCR chain TRAV12-2. This bias is already present in A2/LLW-specific naive Tcells before vaccination with YF-17D. Using CD8(+) Tcell clones, we show that TRAV12-2 does not confer a functional advantage on a per cell basis. Molecular modeling indicated that the germline-encoded complementarity determining region (CDR) 1 loop of TRAV12-2 critically contributes to A2/LLW binding, in contrast to the conventional dominant dependence on somatically rearranged CDR3 loops. This germline component of antigen recognition may explain the unusually high precursor frequency, prevalence and immunodominance of T-cell responses specific for the A2/LLW epitope.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available