4.6 Article

A Strategy to Determine Operating Parameters in Tissue Engineering Hollow Fiber Bioreactors

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages 1450-1461

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.23062

Keywords

tissue engineering; bioreactor; oxygen; mass transport; mathematical modeling

Funding

  1. Christ Church, University of Oxford
  2. Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford
  3. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bath
  4. Oxford University
  5. EPSRC [EP/D070635/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D070635/2] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of tissue engineering hollow fiber bioreactors (HFB) requires the optimal design of the geometry and operation parameters of the system. This article provides a strategy for specifying operating conditions for the system based on mathematical models of oxygen delivery to the cell population. Analytical and numerical solutions of these models are developed based on Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Depending on the minimum oxygen concentration required to culture a functional cell population, together with the oxygen uptake kinetics, the strategy dictates the model needed to describe mass transport so that the operating conditions can be defined. If c(min) >> K-m we capture oxygen uptake using zero-order kinetics and proceed analytically. This enables operating equations to be developed that allow the user to choose the medium flow rate, lumen length, and ECS depth to provide a prescribed value of c(min). When c(min) >> K-m, we use numerical techniques to solve full Michaelis-Menten kinetics and present operating data for the bioreactor. The strategy presented utilizes both analytical and numerical approaches and can be applied to any cell type with known oxygen transport properties and uptake kinetics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108: 1450-1461. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available