4.6 Article

Power Production in MFCs Inoculated With Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 or Mixed Cultures

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 489-498

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22556

Keywords

bioelectricity; MFC; Shewanella; ORP

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-0730359]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Power densities and oxidation-reduction potentials (ORPs) of MFCs containing a pure culture of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 were compared to mixed cultures (wastewater inoculum) in cube shaped, 1-, 2-, and 3-bottle batch-fed MFC reactor configurations. The reactor architecture influenced the relative power produced by the different inocula, with the mixed culture generating 68-480% more power than MR-1 in each MFC configuration. The mixed culture produced the maximum power density of 858 +/- 9 mW m(-2) in the cubic MFC while MR-1 produced 148 +/- 20 mW m(-2). The higher power by the mixed culture was primarily a result of lower internal resistances than those produced by the pure culture. Power was a direct function of ohmic resistance for the mixed culture, but not for strain MR-1 ORP of the anode compartment varied with reactor configuration and inoculum, and it was always negative during maximum power production but it did not vary in proportion to power Output. The ORP varied primarily at the end of the cycle when substrate was depleted, with a change from a reductive environment during maximum power production (approximately -175 mV for mixed and approximately -210 mV for MR-1 in Cubic MFCs), to an oxidative environment at the end of the batch cycle (similar to 250 mV for mixed and similar to 300 mV for MR-1). Mixed cultures produced more power than MR-1 MFCs even though their, redox potential was less negative. These results demonstrate. that differences between power densities produced by pure and mixed cultures depend on the MFC architecture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;105: 489-498. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available