4.6 Article

Hollow fiber liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction followed by solid-phase microextraction and in situ derivatization for the determination of chlorophenols by gas chromatography-electron capture detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1418, Issue -, Pages 45-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.062

Keywords

Solid-phase microextraction; Hollow fiber-based liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction; Chlorophenols; In situ derivatization; Water analysis

Funding

  1. Research Council of Isfahan University of Technology (IUT)
  2. Center of Excellence in Sensor and Green Chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A method based on the combination of hollow fiber liquid-liquid-liquid microextraction and solid-phase microextraction (SPME) followed by gas chromatography-electron capture detection was developed for the determination of chlorophenols in water and wastewater samples. Silica microstructures fabricated on the surface of a stainless steel wire were coated by an organic solvent and used as a SPME fiber. The analytes were extracted through a hollow fiber membrane containing n-decane from sample solution to an alkaline aqueous acceptor phase. They were then extracted and in situ derivatized on the SPME fiber using acetic anhydride. Experimental parameters such as the type of extraction solvent, acceptor phase NaOH concentration, donor phase HCl concentration, the amount of derivatizing reagent, salt concentration, stirring rate and extraction time were investigated and optimized. The precision of the method for the analytes at 0.02-30 mu g L-1 concentration level ranged from 7.1 to 10.2% (as intra-day relative standard deviation) and 6.4 to 9.8% (as inter-day relative standard deviation). The linear dynamic ranges were in the interval of 5-500 mu g L-1, 0.05-5 mu g L-1, 0.02-1 mu g L-1 and 0.001-0.5 mu g L-1 for 2-chlorophenol, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol and pentachlorophenol, respectively. The enrichment factors were between 432 and 785. The limits of detection were in the range of 0.0004-1.2 mu g L-1. Tap water, well water and wastewater samples were also analyzed to evaluate the method capability for real sample analysis. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available