4.6 Article

Quantitative Characterization of Virus-like Particles by Asymmetrical Flow Field Flow Fractionation, Electrospray Differential Mobility Analysis, and Transmission Electron Microscopy

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 845-855

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22085

Keywords

virus; influenza; electrospray differential mobility analysis (ES-DMA); asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AFFFF); polyomavirus

Funding

  1. National Research Council
  2. Australian Research Council [FF0348465, DP0773111]
  3. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [409976]
  4. University of Queensland Graduate School and Center for Biomolecular Engineering scholarships
  5. Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we characterize virus-like particles (VLPs) by three very distinct, orthogonal, and quantitative techniques: electrospray differential mobility analysis (ES-DMA), asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation with multi-angle light scattering detection (AFFFF-MALS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). VLPs are biomolecular particles assembled from viral proteins with applications ranging from synthetic vaccines to vectors for deliver), of gene and drug therapies. VLPs may have polydispersed, multimodal size distributions, where the size distribution can be altered by subtle changes in the production process. These three techniques detect Subtle size differences in VLPs derived from the non-enveloped murine polyomavirus (MPV) following: (i) functionalization of the surface of VLPs with an influenza viral peptide fragment; (ii) packaging of foreign protein internally within the VLPs; and (iii) packaging of genomic DNA internally within the VLPs. These results demonstrate that ES-DMA and AFFFF-MALS are able to quantitatively determine VLP size distributions with greater rapidity and statistical significance than TEM, providing useful technologies for product development and process analytics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available