4.6 Article

Is Marine Stewardship Council's ecolabel a rising tide for all? Consumers' willingness to pay for origin-differentiated ecolabeled canned tuna

Journal

MARINE POLICY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 18-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.07.015

Keywords

Marine Stewardship Council; Country of origin; Willingness to pay; Interaction effect; Ecolabel; Sustainable seafood

Funding

  1. College of Agriculture at the Tennessee State University
  2. Tyson Chair Endowment at the University of Arkansas
  3. Korea University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Marine Stewardship Council's (MSC) sustainable seafood ecolabel covers about 10% of total seafood catch globally. Despite its prevalence, consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for MSC-certified imported seafood is not well understood. Using a choice experiment conducted with an American-consumers sample, this study measures the differences in WTP for American, Ecuadorian, and Vietnamese canned tuna. The results noted two things. First, the ecolabel induces country-specific effects, where the marginal WTP for the MSC label is higher for the imported products than for the domestic product; second, consumers prefer domestic products ceteris paribus, nevertheless, the premium of the ecolabel when attached to the imported products may partially eclipse preference for domestic products without the ecolabel. The results imply that the MSC ecolabel may generate a more favorable effect when applied to products from developing countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available