4.2 Article

The status of support for cannabis regulation in Uruguay 4 years after reform: Evidence from public opinion surveys

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages S429-S434

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12642

Keywords

cannabis; marijuana legalisation; Uruguay; public opinion

Funding

  1. Open Society Foundations [OR2014-18322]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction and AimsThe objective of this study was to measure the public support for marijuana legalisation in Uruguay, both overall and in its provisions, in nearly 4 years after its implementation. Design and MethodsThree separate cross-national surveys were conducted in early 2014, late 2015 and mid-2017 with national representative samples of adults. The first study was carried out during the initial months of implementation of the law and used face-to-face interviews (N=1490); the second survey was conducted using a computer-assisted telephone interviewing system (N=703); and the third study (N=1515), using face-to-face interviews, was completed just before the implementation of pharmacy sales. ResultsAbout 60.7% of respondents in 2014 were against marijuana legalisation; in 2017, 54.1% remained opposed to the marijuana law. In 2015, half of the people interviewed (49.9%) supported access to marijuana through self-cultivation, while 38.6% favoured the provision of cannabis clubs and 33.1% agreed with the pharmacy retail provision. Support for medical cannabis was high in 2015, with 74.5% favouring it. Discussion and ConclusionsThis study shows a change in the public opinion toward legalisation of marijuana although most people still remain opposed to the law. However, the data do not provide indication of a significant change in its use. Results suggest that opposition to legalisation may be focused on the pharmacy retail provision.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available