4.2 Article

Understanding remote Aboriginal drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation clients: Who attends, who leaves and who stays?

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages S404-S414

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12656

Keywords

residential rehabilitation treatment; Aboriginal Australians; substance-related disorders; rural; client characteristics

Funding

  1. Far West Medicate Local

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction and AimsAboriginal residential rehabilitation services provide healing for Aboriginal people who misuse substances. There is limited available research that empirically describes client characteristics of these services. This study examined 5 years of data of a remote Aboriginal residential rehabilitation service. Design and MethodsRetrospective analysis of 329 client admissions to Orana Haven Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Centre from 2011 to 2016. Multinomial and binary logistic regressions were conducted to identify trends in the data. ResultsThere were 66 admissions recorded annually, of which most identified as Aboriginal (85%). Mean length of stay was 56days, with one in three (36%) discharging within the first month. A third (32%) completed, 47% self-discharged and 20% house-discharged from the program. Client age significantly increased over time (P = 0.03), with most aged from 26 to 35. Older clients were significantly more likely to readmit (P < 0.002) and stay longer than 90days (P = 0.02). Most clients were referred from the criminal justice system, significantly increasing from 79% (2011-2012) to 96% (2015-2016) (P < 0.001) and these clients were more likely to self-discharge (P < 0.01). Among a subset of clients, most (69%) reported concerns with polysubstance use and half (51%) reported mental illness. Discussion and ConclusionsThe current study makes a unique contribution to the literature by empirically describing the characteristics of clients of a remote Aboriginal residential rehabilitation service to more accurately tailor the service to the client's needs. Key recommendations include integrating these empirical observations with staff and client perceptions to co-design a model of care, standardise data collection, and routinely following-up clients to monitor treatment effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available