4.7 Review

Towards rationally designed biomanufacturing of therapeutic extracellular vesicles: impact of the bioproduction microenvironment

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES
Volume 36, Issue 8, Pages 2051-2059

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.09.001

Keywords

Extracellular vesicle; Exosome; Mesenchymal stem cell; Biomanufacturing; Microenvironment

Funding

  1. American Heart Association [16PRE30770016]
  2. MSCRF Postdoctoral Fellowship Program [4301172]
  3. National Institutes of Health [HL112905, HL141611]
  4. National Science Foundation [CBET 1750542]
  5. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering/National Institutes of Health (NIBIB/NIH) Center for Engineering Complex Tissues [P41 EB023833]
  6. University of Maryland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, microvesicles, and others, have emerged as potential therapeutics for a variety of applications. Pre-clinical reports of EV efficacy in treatment of non-healing wounds, myocardial infarction, osteoarthritis, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, and many other injuries and diseases demonstrate the versatility of this nascent therapeutic modality. EVs have also been demonstrated to be effective in humans, and clinical trials are underway to further explore their potential. However, for EVs to become a new class of clinical therapeutics, issues related to translation must be addressed. For example, approaches originally developed for cell biomanufacturing, such as hollow fiber bioreactor culture, have been adapted for EV production, but limited knowledge of how the cell culture microenvironment specifically impacts EVs restricts the possibility for rational design and optimization of EV production and potency. In this review, we discuss current knowledge of this issue and delineate potential focus areas for future research towards enabling translation and widespread application of EV-based therapeutics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available