4.4 Article

A questionnaire study to explore the views of people with multiple sclerosis of using smartphone technology for health care purposes

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 1434-1442

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1300332

Keywords

Physiotherapy; chronic condition; neurological; E-health; management

Categories

Funding

  1. Health Research Board Summer Studentship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Delivering interventions over the lifetime of people with chronic conditions is an international healthcare challenge. The benefits of technology in healthcare have been demonstrated in many health conditions. This study aims to seek the views of People with multiple sclerosis (MS) of the feasibility and perceived acceptability of smartphone use for healthcare purposes. Methods: Using SurveyMonkey, respondents answered 21 items about their smartphone use and acceptance of smartphones in healthcare. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data from closed questions. Content analysis was used for open questions. Results: Most of the self-selected 197 respondents were female (138/197;70.1%), aged 42.78 +/- 10.29 years, had relapsing-remitting MS (143/187;76.5%), and mobilized without an aid (154/197;78.17%). Most respondents reported having smartphone access (174/191;91.1%) and owning smartphones (167/192;86.97%). Perceived benefits of smartphones included improved healthcare access (119/190;62.63%) and greater independence (124/190;65.26%). The top three concerns included reduced contact with Healthcare Professionals (66/186;35.48%), data security (60/186;32.26%) and visual impairment (47/184;25.54%). Conclusion: These findings suggest that smartphone use is extensive, frequent, and acceptable for healthcare purposes in this self-selected sample. People with MS should be consulted during the design of smartphone-based interventions, as specific concerns were raised. Future studies should explore how this technology may be best used and implemented in practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available