4.5 Article

Mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force following segmental resection of the mandible without or with reconstruction

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 1707-1716

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2263-3

Keywords

Segmental resection; Mandibular kinematics; Bite force; Autologous reconstruction of mandible; TMJ TJR

Funding

  1. Department of Prosthodontics, Preclinical Education and Dental Material Science, University Hospital Bonn

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives The purpose was to analyze mandibular kinematics and maximum voluntary bite force in patients following segmental resection of the mandible without and with reconstruction (autologous bone, alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJ TJR)). Materials and methods Subjects operated from April 2002 to August 2014 were enrolled in the study. Condylar (CRoM) and incisal (InRoM) range of motion and deflection during opening, condylar retrusion, incisal lateral excursion, mandibular rotation angle during opening, and maximum voluntary bite force were determined on the non-affected site and compared between groups. Influence of co-factors (defect size, soft tissue deficit, neck dissection, radiotherapy, occlusal contact zones (OCZ), and time) was determined. Results Twelve non-reconstructed and 26 reconstructed patients (13 autologous, 13 TMJ TJR) were included in the study. InRoM opening and bite force were significantly higher (P <= .024), and both condylar and incisal deflection during opening significantly lower (P <= .027) in reconstructed patients compared with non-reconstructed. Differences between the autologous and the TMJ TJR group were statistically not significant. Co-factors defect size, soft tissue deficit, and neck dissection had the greatest impact on kinematics and number of OCZs on bite force. Conclusions Reconstructed patients (both autologous and TMJ TJR) have better overall function than non-reconstructed patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available