4.7 Article

How significant is energy efficiency to mitigate CO2 emissions? Evidence from OECD countries

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 200-221

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.04.010

Keywords

Energy efficiency; Index decomposition analysis; STSM, bias-corrected LSDV; CO2 emissions; OECD

Categories

Funding

  1. Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF)
  2. Economic Discipline Area, University of Manchester

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper develops a two-step approach to investigate the effect of energy efficiency improvements on CO2 emissions at the macro level. We use the index decomposition analysis to derive the true energy efficiency by separating out the impact of structural shifts in economic activity on energy intensity. We then employ both STSM and LSDVC models to examine and quantify the impact of the energy efficiency on CO2 emissions accounting for non-economic factors such as consumers' lifestyle, attitudes and environmental awareness. The application for 30 OECD countries shows that at the group level, the decline in energy intensity predominately occurred due to improvements in energy efficiency while at the country level, there are mixed contributions from improvement in energy efficiency and structural shift to the decline in energy intensity. The econometric results show that income has the most significant positive impact on CO2 emissions but improving energy efficiency makes the biggest contribution to driving down CO2 emissions. The method further enables the separate assessment of non-economic behavioural effects, which are found to exert a non-trivial influence on CO2 emissions in parallel with changes in energy efficiency. We conclude that energy efficiency remains a key option but that there is also a need for additional policies aiming for behavioural and other non-economic changes. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available