4.6 Article

Boosting and Decreasing Action Prediction Abilities Through Excitatory and Inhibitory tDCS of Inferior Frontal Cortex

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 1282-1296

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx041

Keywords

action prediction; inferior frontal cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation; action observation network; neuroenhancement

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministero della Salute [Bando Ricerca Finalizzata Giovani Ricercatori] [GR-2010-2319335]
  2. Cogito Foundation [R-117/13, 14-139-R]
  3. Ministero Istruzione, Universita e Ricerca [RBFR12F0BD]
  4. BIAL Foundation [2016-18, 298/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Influential theories suggest that humans predict others' upcoming actions by using their own motor system as an internal forward model. However, evidence that the motor system is causally essential for predicting others' actions is meager. Using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we tested the role of the inferior frontal cortex (IFC), in action prediction (AP). We devised a novel AP task where participants observed the initial phases of right-hand reaching-to-grasp actions and had to predict their outcome (i.e., the goal/object to be grasped). We found that suppression by cathodal (inhibitory) tDCS of the left IFC, but not the left superior temporal sulcus or the right IFC, selectively impaired performance on the AP task, but not on a difficulty-matched control task. Remarkably, anodal (excitatory) tDCS of the left IFC brought about a selective improvement in the AP task. These findings indicate that the left IFC is necessary for predicting the outcomes of observed human right-hand actions. Crucially, our study shows for the first time that down-and up-regulating excitability within the motor system can hinder and enhance AP abilities, respectively. These findings support predictive coding theories of action perception and have implications for enhancement of AP abilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available