4.6 Review

Measurement of Vitamin D for Epidemiologic and Clinical Research: Shining Light on a Complex Decision

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 187, Issue 4, Pages 879-890

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwx297

Keywords

biomarkers; epimers; 25-hydroxyvitamin D; immunoassays; mass spectrometry; validity; vitamin D

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R00HD079659]
  2. National Institute on Aging [R01AG041776]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R01HL103706]
  4. Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health [R01HL103706-S1]
  5. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R00HD079659] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR001863] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL103706] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [ZIAES103333] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG041776] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that is synthesized in the skin with exposure to sunlight or is ingested from dietary supplements or food. There has been a dramatic increase in research on vitamin D, linking it with health outcomes as varied as reproductive function, infection, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. The study of vitamin D has generated much excitement, partly because there is an ideal intervention: Low levels may be common and can be remedied with widely available supplements. Determination of vitamin D status is complex and has advanced dramatically in the past 5 years. In this paper, we begin by describing important considerations for measurement of total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), the biomarker traditionally assessed in epidemiologic studies. While 25(OH) D remains the most commonly measured biomarker, emerging evidence suggests that other related analytes may contribute to the characterization of an individual's vitamin D status (e.g., vitamin D-binding protein, bioavailable and free 25(OH)D, the C-3 epimer of 25(OH)D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D). The measurement of these analytes is also complex, and there are important considerations for deciding whether their measurement is warranted in new research studies. Herein we discuss these issues and provide the reader with an up-to-date synthesis of research on vitaminD measurement options and considerations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available