4.7 Article

Uncertainty, politics, and technology: Expert perceptions on energy transitions in the United Kingdom

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages 122-132

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.003

Keywords

Climate policy; Energy policy; Uncertainty analysis; Decision-making

Funding

  1. UK Energy Technologies Institute (ETI)
  2. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under the Whole Systems Energy Modelling Consortium (wholeSEM) [EP/K039326/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K039326/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K039326/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Energy policy is beset by deep uncertainties, owing to the scale of future transitions, the long-term timescales for action, and numerous stakeholders. This paper provides insights from semi-structured interviews with 31 UK experts from government, industry, academia, and civil society. Participants were asked for their views on the major uncertainties surrounding the ability of the UK to meet its 2050 climate targets. The research reveals a range of views on the most critical uncertainties, how they can be mitigated, and how the research community can develop approaches to better support strategic decision-making. The study finds that the socio-political dimensions of uncertainty are discussed by experts almost as frequently as technological ones, but that there exist divergent perspectives on the role of government in the transition and whether or not there is a requirement for increased societal engagement. Finally, the study finds that decision-makers require a new approach to uncertainty assessment that overcomes analytical limits to existing practice, is more flexible and adaptable, and which better integrates qualitative narratives with quantitative analysis. Policy design must escape from 'caged' thinking concerning what can or cannot be included in models, and therefore what types of uncertainties can or cannot be explored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available