4.3 Article

A modified feeding RNAi method for simultaneous knock-down of more than one gene in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

BIOTECHNIQUES
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 229-232

Publisher

FUTURE SCI LTD
DOI: 10.2144/000113365

Keywords

C. elegans; feeding RNA interference; double knock-down

Funding

  1. Research Center for Functional Cellulomics at Seoul National University
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF)
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [20090083336]
  4. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs [0920230]
  5. Korean Research Foundation [2005-037-C00027]
  6. Brain Korea 21 (BK21) program [2007]
  7. Seoul RBD Program [2007]
  8. Korea Health Promotion Institute [0920230] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  9. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0057809, 2005-037-C00027, 2007-03651] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA interference (RNAi) is a commonly used technique for reverse genetic approaches in Caenorhabditis elegans. Feeding RNAi is the most convenient and inexpensive method for performing genome-wide RNAi screens. However, it has been reported that knock-down of two genes (double RNAi) by feeding RNAi using a mixture of bacteria that each contained one dsRNA species produced poor results. To overcome this problem of inefficiency, we designed and tested a double feeding RNAi method using a single RNAi construct containing two gene fragments. From experiments with three different sets of genes, we found that the new double RNAi method consistently produced significantly enhanced double knock-down phenotypes. The double feeding RNAi approach described here provides a method to consistently examine phenotypes caused by depletion of more than one gene in C. elegans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available