4.6 Article

Topographic correlation between juxtapapillary choroidal thickness and parapapillary deep-layer microvasculature dropout in primary open-angle glaucoma

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages 1134-1140

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311136

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund, Seongnam, Korea [02-2016-045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To investigate the topographic relationship between parapapillary deep-layer microvasculature dropout (MvD) as assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) and the juxtapapillary choroidal thickness (JPCT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods A total of 194 eyes (138 POAG and 56 control eyes) having parapapillary atrophy (PPA) were imaged using the swept-source OCT and OCTA to examine the microstructure of PPA and measure the JPCT, and to determine the presence of the MvD. MvD was defined as a focal sectoral capillary dropout without any visible microvascular network identified in the parapapillary deep-layer in the en face OCTA images. Results JPCT was smaller in the POAG group than control group at 6-, 6.5-, 7- and 7.5-o'clock meridians (all p <= 0.002). When POAG eyes were classified into those with parapapillary y-zone and those with only beta-zone without gamma-zone, the mean JPCT was significantly smaller in the latter (p=0.027). The JPCT differed between with and without MvD only in eyes with a 'gamma-zone: the JPCT was smaller in the eyes having MvD at 7- and 7.5-o'clock meridians (both p=0.001), where MvD was detected most frequently. However, such a difference was not observed in the eyes with only beta-zone without the gamma-zone at any of the meridians. Conclusions Localised reductions in JPCT were observed at the location of MvD in POAG eyes with parapapillary gamma-zone. Such a correlation was not observed in the POAG eyes with only beta-zone, but the mean JPCT was significantly smaller in this group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available