4.5 Article

Test for interactions between a genetic marker set and environment in generalized linear models

Journal

BIOSTATISTICS
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages 667-681

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxt006

Keywords

Asymptotic bias analysis; Gene-environment interactions; Genome-wide association studies; Score statistic; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Variance component test

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [K99 HL113164, R37 CA076404, P01 CA134294, R01 CA092824, R01 CA074386, P50 CA090578, P42 ES016454, P30 ES00002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider in this paper testing for interactions between a genetic marker set and an environmental variable. A common practice in studying gene-environment (GE) interactions is to analyze one single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at a time. It is of significant interest to analyze SNPs in a biologically defined set simultaneously, e. g. gene or pathway. In this paper, we first show that if the main effects of multiple SNPs in a set are associated with a disease/trait, the classical single SNP-GE interaction analysis can be biased. We derive the asymptotic bias and study the conditions under which the classical single SNP-GE interaction analysis is unbiased. We further show that, the simple minimum p-value-based SNP-set GE analysis, can be biased and have an inflated Type 1 error rate. To overcome these difficulties, we propose a computationally efficient and powerful gene-environment set association test (GESAT) in generalized linear models. Our method tests for SNP-set by environment interactions using a variance component test, and estimates the main SNP effects under the null hypothesis using ridge regression. We evaluate the performance of GESAT using simulation studies, and apply GESAT to data from the Harvard lung cancer genetic study to investigate GE interactions between the SNPs in the 15q24-25.1 region and smoking on lung cancer risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available