4.5 Article

Bayesian graphical models for regression on multiple data sets with different variables

Journal

BIOSTATISTICS
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 335-351

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxn041

Keywords

Air pollution; Confounding; Data synthesis; Low birth weight; Multiple imputation

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-576-25-5003]
  2. Department of Health [PHI/03/C1/045]
  3. Medical Research Council [U. 1052.00.008, U. 1052.00.001]
  4. MRC [MC_U105232027] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-576-25-5003] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MC_U105232027] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Routinely collected administrative data sets, such as national registers, aim to collect information on a limited number of variables for the whole population. In contrast, survey and cohort studies contain more detailed data from a sample of the population. This paper describes Bayesian graphical models for fitting a common regression model to a combination of data sets with different sets of covariates. The methods are applied to a study of low birth weight and air pollution in England and Wales using a combination of register, survey, and small-area aggregate data. We discuss issues such as multiple imputation of confounding variables missing in one data set, survey selection bias, and appropriate propagation of information between model components. From the register data, there appears to be an association between low birth weight and environmental exposure to NO(2), but after adjusting for confounding by ethnicity and maternal smoking by combining the register and survey data under our models, we find there is no significant association. However, NO(2) was associated with a small but significant reduction in birth weight, modeled as a continuous variable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available