4.8 Article

Quaternized magnetic nanoparticles-fluorescent polymer system for detection and identification of bacteria

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 289-293

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2013.11.080

Keywords

Quatemized magnetic nanoparticles; Bacteria detection; Fluorescent polymer; Linear discriminant analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41306072, 41076047]
  2. Science & Technology Basic Research Program of Qingdao [13-1-4181-jch]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [BS2013HZ005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanomaterial-based 'chemical nose' sensor with sufficient sensing specificity is a useful analytical tool for the detection of toxicologically important substances in complicated biological systems. A sensor array containing three quaternized magnetic nanoparticles (q-MNPs)-fluorescent polymer systems has been designed to identify and quantify bacteria. The bacterial cell membranes disrupt the q-MNP-fluorescent polymer, generating unique fluorescence response array. The response intensity of the array is dependent on the level of displacement determined by the relative q-MNP-fluorescent polymer binding strength and bacteria cells-MNP interaction. These characteristic responses show a highly repeatable bacteria cells and can be differentiated by linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Based on the array response matrix from LDA, our approach has been used to measure bacteria with an accuracy of 87.5% for 107 cfu mL-1 within 20 min. Combined with UV-vis measurement, the method can be successfully performed to identify and detect eight different pathogen samples with an accuracy of 96.8%. The measurement system has a potential for further applications and provides a facile and simple method for the rapid analysis of protein, DNA, and pathogens. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available