4.8 Article

Label-free detection of Staphylococcus aureus in skin using real-time potentiometric biosensors based on carbon nanotubes and aptamers

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 226-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2011.10.021

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus; Real-time; Carbon nanotubes; Aptamers; Label-free; Potentiometry

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [CTQ2010-18717]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya (Catalan Government)
  3. European Social Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we report the first biosensor that is able to detect Staphylococcus aureus in real-time. A network of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) acts as an ion-to-electron potentiometric transducer and anti-S. aureus aptamers are the recognition element. Carbon nanotubes were functionalized with aptamers using two different approaches: (1) non-covalent adsorption of drop-casted pyrenil-modified aptamers onto the external walls of the SWCNTs; and (2) covalent bond formation between amine-modified aptamers and carboxylic groups previously introduced by oxidation at the ends of the SWCNTs. Both of these approaches yielded functional biosensors but there were large differences in the minimum detectable bacteria concentration and sensitivity values. With covalent functionalization, the minimum concentration detected was 8 x 10(2) colony-forming units (CFU)/mL and the sensitivity was 0.36 mV/Decade. With the non-covalent approach, the sensitivity was higher (1.52 mV/Decade) but the minimum concentration detected was greatly affected (10(7) CFU/mL). In both cases, potential as a function of Decade of bacteria concentration was linear. Functional biosensors were used to test real samples from freshly excised pig skin, contaminated with the target microorganism, as a surrogate for human skin. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available