4.8 Article

A G-quadruplex based label-free fluorescent biosensor for lead ion

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 123-127

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2012.02.031

Keywords

G-quadruplex; Fluorescence biosensor; Lead ion; N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX; DNAzyme

Funding

  1. NSFC [21177023]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [211084]
  3. Foundation of Fujian Educational Committee of China [JA10017]
  4. National Key Technologies R & D Program of China [2012BAD29B06]
  5. Fujian Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2010H6010, 2011Y0016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many Pb2+ biosensors based on Pb2+-specific RNA-cleaving DNAzyme have been developed in the past years. However, many of them have limited practical use because of high cost (e.g., enzymes), complicated processing and the use of unstable molecules (e.g., RNA). In this study, a novel label-free fluorescent biosensor for Pb2+ was proposed based on Pb2+-induced allosteric G-quadruplex (PS2.M). In the presence of K+, N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX (NMM) could bind to K+-stabilized G-quadruplexes, giving rise to high fluorescence. On addition of Pb2+, Pb2+ competitively binded to K+-stabilized G-quadruplexes to form more compact DNA folds. The Pb2+-stabilized G-quadruplexes did not bind to NMM, which resulted in fluorescence decrease. This allowed us to utilize PS2.M for quantitative analysis of Pb2+ using the NMM-G-quadruplex system by convenient mix-and-detect protocol. The fluorescence emission ratio (F-0/F) showed a good linear response toward Pb2+ over the range from 5.0 nM to 1.0 mu M with a limit of detection of 1.0 nM. This proposed biosensor was simple and cost efficiency in design and in operation with high sensitivity and selectivity. We validated the practicality of this biosensor for the determination of Pb2+ in lake water samples. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available