4.3 Review

Air Pollution and Cardiometabolic Disease: An Update and Call for Clinical Trials

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 1-10

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpx109

Keywords

blood pressure; cardiovascular; diabetes mellitus; hypertension; morbidity; pollutants; prevention

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-ES015146]
  2. University of Michigan-Peking University Joint Institute for Translational and Clinical Research
  3. MRC [G0701127] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G0701127] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK020572] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES015146] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fine particulate matter < 2.5 A mu m (PM2.5) air pollution is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. The largest portion of deaths is now known to be due to cardiovascular disorders. Several air pollutants can trigger acute events (e.g., myocardial infarctions, strokes, heart failure). However, mounting evidence additionally supports that longer-term exposures pose a greater magnified risk to cardiovascular health. One explanation may be that PM2.5 has proven capable of promoting the development of chronic cardiometabolic conditions including atherosclerosis, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. Here, we provide an updated overview of recent major studies regarding the impact of PM2.5 on cardiometabolic health and outline key remaining scientific questions. We discuss the relevance of emerging trials evaluating personal-level strategies (e.g., facemasks) to prevent the harmful effects of PM2.5, and close with a call for large-scale outcome trials to allow for the promulgation of formal evidence-base recommendations regarding their appropriate usage in the global battle against air pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available