4.2 Article

Maternal Gut Microbiome Biodiversity in Pregnancy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 24-30

Publisher

THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1604412

Keywords

gut microbiome; pregnancy; gestational weight gain; gastrointestinal; microbiome

Funding

  1. UNC Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease [NIH P30 DK 034987]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK034987] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [P30ES010126] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To measure maternal gut microbiome biodiversity in pregnancy. Materials and Methods In phase 1, maternal fecal samples were collected by rectal swab in 20 healthy pregnant women (14-28 weeks gestation) to measure bacterial abundance. In phase 2, fecal samples were collected from 31 women at enrollment (<20 weeks gestation, baseline) and at 36 to 39 weeks of gestation (follow-up). We assessed cluster analysis to assess bacterial community profiles at the phylum level longitudinally through pregnancy. DNA was extracted from swabs, followed by PCR of the bacterial 16s rRNA gene and multiplex high-throughput sequencing (Ion Torrent). Results In phase 1, 16 of 20 samples yielded usable data. White women ( n =10) had greater abundance of Firmicutes (230.15 vs. 16%+/- 0.75, p =0.007) and Bacteroidetes (24 +/- 0.14 vs. 19%+/- 0.68, p =0.015) compared with non-White women ( n =6). In the 11 paired specimens, Bacteroidetes increased in abundance from baseline to follow-up. Compared with women who gained weight below the median gestational weight gain (GWG, <15.4 kg), those who gained above the median GWG had increased abundance of Bacteroidetes ( p =0.02) and other phyla ( p =0.04). Conclusion Maternal microbiome biodiversity changes as pregnancy progresses and correlates with GWG.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available