4.8 Article

The role of local adaptation in sustainable production of village chickens

Journal

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 1, Issue 10, Pages 574-582

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0150-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/H009396/1, BB/H009159/1, BB/H009051/1]
  2. UK Department for International Development (DFID) [BB/H009396/1, BB/H009159/1, BB/H009051/1]
  3. Scottish Government [BB/H009396/1, BB/H009159/1, BB/H009051/1]
  4. CGIAR fund
  5. BBSRC [BB/H009051/1, BB/H009159/1, BB/H009396/1, BB/R021279/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Village chickens are ubiquitous in smallholder farming systems, contributing to household, local and national economies under diverse environmental, economic and cultural settings. However, they are raised in challenging environments where productivity is low while mortality is high. There is much interest in utilizing indigenous genetic resources to produce a chicken that is resilient to its environment, while at the same time providing the basis of an economically sustainable enterprise. Globally, however, a wide variety of interventions have so far proved unable to deliver sustainable improvements. Here we show that regional differences in trait preferences and parasite burden are associated with distinct chicken gene pools, probably in response to interactions between natural and human-driven (economic and social) selection pressures. Drivers of regional differences include marketing opportunities, cultural preferences, agro-ecologies and parasite populations, and are evident in system adaptations, such as management practices, population dynamics and bird genotypes. Our results provide sound multidisciplinary evidence to support previous observations that sustainable poultry development interventions for smallholder farmers, including breeding programmes, should be locally tailored and designed for flexible implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available