4.5 Article

The Intersection of Emotional and Sociocognitive Competencies with Civic Engagement in Middle Childhood and Adolescence

Journal

JOURNAL OF YOUTH AND ADOLESCENCE
Volume 47, Issue 8, Pages 1663-1683

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10964-018-0842-5

Keywords

Civic engagement; Political participation; Positive youth development; Prosocial behavior; Developmental theory

Funding

  1. John Templeton Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1551561] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1551736] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Civic developmental theory anticipates connections between normative developmental competencies and civic engagement, but little previous research has directly studied such links. The current study sought to contribute to civic development theory by examining associations between emotional and sociocognitive competencies (empathy, emotion regulation, prosocial moral reasoning, future-orientation) and civic engagement (volunteering, informal helping, political behaviors and beliefs, environmental behaviors, social responsibility values, civic skills). Data came from a geographically and racially diverse sample of 2467 youth (M (age) = 13.4, Range: 8-20 years, 56% female). The results indicated that empathy and future-orientation significantly predicted nearly all forms of civic engagement, whereas emotion regulation and prosocial moral reasoning were uniquely associated with specific forms of civic engagement. Exploratory multi-group models indicated that empathy and emotion regulation were more strongly associated with civic engagement among younger youth and prosocial moral reasoning and future-orientation were more strongly related to civic engagement among older youth. The findings help to advance developmental theory of youth civic engagement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available