4.8 Article

Development of an immunochromatographic assay for the rapid detection of chlorpyrifos-methyl in water samples

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 189-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.06.005

Keywords

Chlorpyrifos-methyl; Gold immunochromatographic assay; Colloidal gold; One-step strip test; Pesticide residue

Funding

  1. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA10Z447]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2009BADB9B03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid (less than 10 min), qualitative and semi-quantitative immunochromatography using colloidal gold-antibody probe was successfully developed and applied in determination of chlorpyrifos-methyl (a wide-spectrum organophosphorus pesticide) in water samples The qualitative detection limit of chlorpyrifos-methyl was determined as 0 6 mu g ml(-1) by using immunochromatography. In the semi-quantitative experiment, the detection results of chlorpyrifos-methyl were scanned by a membrane strip reader, and a detection curve representing the scanned data average was obtained. After conversion, it was observed that in the range of 50 - 12,150 ng ml(-1), the graph between logit(B/B-0)and logarithm of concentration of chlorpyrifos-methyl was linear, from which, the regression equation (y = 2 5229x + 7 5951, R-2 = 0 9889) and IC50 value (1024.39 ng ml(-1)) was obtained, respectively Meanwhile, the detection limit was calculated as 132 91 ng ml(-1) by the extrapolation of B-0 - 2SD In addition, the cross-reactivines were less than 1% with tested analog compounds and regarded as negligible The recoveries obtained by standard chlorpyrifos-methyl addition to water samples were 102 5-107 6% Overall, to our knowledge, this is the first report of qualitative and semi-quantitative detection of chlorpyrifos-methyl by immunochromatography (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available