4.8 Article

Single-cell trapping utilizing negative dielectrophoretic quadrupole and microwell electrodes

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages 3637-3644

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.05.027

Keywords

Single-cell trap; Negative dielectrophoresis (nDEP); Electrothermal flow; Cell manipulation

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC 96-2221-E-006-289]
  2. Ministry of Education in Taiwan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The handling of individual cells, which has attracted increasing attention. is a key technique in cell engineering such as gene introduction, drug injection, and cloning technology. Alternating current (AC) electrokinetics has shown great potential for microfluidic functions such as pumping, mixing, and concentrating particles. The non-uniform electric field gives rise to Joule heating and dielectrophoresis (DEP). The motion of particles suspended in the medium can be influenced directly, by means of dielectrophoretic effects, and indirectly, via fluid flow through a viscous drag force that affects the particles. Thus alternating current electrothermal effect (ACET) induced flow and DEP force can be combined to manipulate and trap single particles and cells. This study presents a microfluidic device which is capable of specifically guiding and capturing single particles and cells by ACET fluid flow and the negative dielectrophoretic (nDEP) trap, respectively. The experiment was operated at high frequencies (5-12 MHz) and in a culture medium whose high conductivity (sigma = 1.25 S/m) is of interest to biochemical analysis and environmental monitoring, which are both prone to producing ACET and nDEP. Manipulation of particle motion using ACET-induced fluid flow to the target trap is modeled numerically and is in good agreement with the experimental results. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available